Acute massive rotator cuff rupture with posterior shoulder dislocation: arthroscopic novel repair of a rare injury. A case report.

Acute massive rotator cuff tears and posterior shoulder dislocations are an extremely rare association, and a vast majority are treated by open surgery. We present a case of a man in his 20s who suffered closed left shoulder trauma after a road traffic accident. He was initially diagnosed with posterior shoulder dislocation and a reduction was successfully performed. However, the patient still complained of persistent weakness during active movements. We found a massive rotator cuff tear involving all the rotator cuff tendons, with significant supraspinatus retraction and persistent posterior shoulder subluxation. He underwent an all-arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff with a double-row technique in the subscapularis, supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. Capsular repair and tenodesis of the biceps tendon were also performed. The patient had good recovery, reaching full preinjury function 3 months after surgery with a successful return to his regular activities.

Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injury: A cohort study of adults admitted to public and private hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

This study aimed to estimate the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injury (PI) and its risk factors in inpatient and intensive care units of five hospitals (two public and three private) in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. A 6-month follow-up prospective cohort study (n = 1937) was conducted from April to September 2013. Baseline and follow-up measurements included demographic and care information, as well as risk assessments for both undernutrition (NRS-2002) and PI (Braden scale). Poisson regression with robust variance was used for data analysis. A total of 633 patients (32.60%) showed risk for PI. The incidence rate of PI was of 5.9% (9.9% in public hospitals vs 4.1% in private hospitals) and was higher in intensive care units, compared to inpatient care units (10% vs 5.7%, respectively). Risk for PI increased with age (RR = 1.05; 95% CI 1.04-1.07); was higher in in public hospitals, compared to private hospitals (RR = 4.39; 95% CI 2.92-6.61); in patients admitted for non-surgical reasons compared to those admitted for surgical reasons (RR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.12-3.27); in patients with longer hospital stays (RR = 1.04; 95% CI 1.03-1.06); high blood pressure (RR = 1.76; 95% CI 1.17-2.64); or had a risk for undernutrition (RR = 3.51; 95% CI 1.71-7.24). Higher scores in the Braden scale was associated with a decreased risk of PI (RR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.75-0.83). The results of our study indicate that 5.9% of all patients developed PI and that the most important factors that nurses should consider are: patient age, care setting, length of hospitalization, comorbidities, reason for admission and nutrition when planning and implementing PI-preventative actions.

Trauma esplénico cerrado: predictores de la falla del manejo no operatorio / Blunt splenic trauma: predictors of failure of nonoperative management

Introducción. El manejo no operatorio del trauma esplénico cerrado es el método preferencial para la preservación esplénica; sin embargo, los criterios para decidir qué pacientes pueden ser manejados sin cirugía sigue siendo materia de debate. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir las características generales de estos pacientes, los resultados del manejo no operatorio y explorar los factores asociados a su falla. Métodos. Es un estudio descriptivo de los pacientes con diagnóstico de trauma esplénico cerrado, admitidos a un centro de atención de alta complejidad, durante el periodo comprendido entre enero de 2003 y marzo de 2009. Los pacientes se clasificaron en dos grupos: manejo operatorio y manejo no operatorio; en el último se analizaron los pacientes en los que falló dicho manejo. Un valor de p menor de 0,05 se consideró de significancia estadística. Resultados. Se incluyeron 82 pacientes. Después de la evaluación primaria o secundaria, el 25,6 % recibió manejo operatorio y, el 74,4 %, manejo no operatorio; el tratamiento no quirúrgico falló en el 22,9 %. Esta falla se asoció con un puntaje Injury Severity Score (ISS) mayor o igual a 20 (RR=6,4; IC95% 2,34-17,86), presencia de hemoperitoneo en la tomografía axial de ingreso (p=0,02) y el grado de lesión esplénica (p<0,001). Las complicaciones ocurrieron en el 31,7 % y las infecciones fueron la causa más frecuente en ambos grupos. La mortalidad global fue 7,3 % (3 pacientes en el grupo de manejo no operatorio y 3 en el de manejo operatorio), debida a las lesiones asociadas en la mayoría de los pacientes. Conclusiones. La mayoría de pacientes con trauma cerrado de bazo puede recibir manejo no operatorio, siendo este un método seguro y efectivo para la preservación esplénica, si se mantiene una vigilancia clínica continua, especialmente en casos de trauma grave.

Background: Nonoperative Management (NOM) of blunt splenic injuries is the preferred method of management for splenic preservation; however, the criteria for deciding what group of patients can be managed non-operatively remain controversial. The aim of this study was to describe the general features of this group of patients as well as to explore the results and factors related to failure of NOM. Methods: We described patients who were admitted to a first level trauma center with a diagnosis of blunt splenic injury between January 2003 and March 2009. The patients were classified in two groups: operative management and NOM; in the last group we analyzed the factors associated with failure. Results: A total of 82 patients were included in the study. Operative Management during the primary or secondary survey was performed on 25.6 % of patients, while 74.4% under went NOM. Of those who underwent NOM, 22.9% failed treatment. An Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥20 (RR: 6.4 – CI 95%: 2.34-17.86), hemoperitoneum on the initial computed tomography (CT) scan (p=0.02), and splenic injury grade were factors associated with failed NOM (FNOM). The overall mortality rate was 7.3%; 14.3% for OM and 4.9% for NOM groups, respectively. Conclusions: The majority of blunt splenic trauma patients are candidates for NOM, as it is a safe and effective technique for splenic preservation if continuous medical surveillance is maintained.

Pronóstico de pacientes con diagnóstico de carcinoma hepatocelular (CHC) en un hospital de máximo nivel de atención / Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a maximum level of hospital care

Introducción. El CHC afecta de manera importante la supervivencia porque se diagnostica tardíamente en muchos países. Objetivos. Describir la supervivencia, características clínicas y bioquímicas en pacientes con diagnóstico de CHC. Metodología. Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo en pacientes diagnosticados con CHC. Se recolectaron variables y se analizó el desenlace, con seguimiento de 6 meses. El diagnóstico de CHC se hizo según los criterios de la Asociación Europea para el estudio del hígado y criterios histológicos en caso de disponer de biopsia. Resultados. Un total de 35 pacientes ingresaron al estudio. Doce tenían diagnóstico de CHC (34%) y 23 (66%) diagnóstico de CHC asociado a cirrosis. Las etiologías de los casos de cirrosis y CHC fueron consumo de alcohol (12, 52%), virus B (VHB) (3, 13%), virus C (VHC) (1, 4,3%), criptogénica (5, 21,7%), esteatohepatitis no alcohólica (EHNA) (1, 4,3%), y coexistencia de virus B y alcohol (1, 4,3%). Con base en los criterios del BCLC cinco pacientes recibieron transplante hepático (15,6%), 3 (9,4%) resección quirúrgica, 8 (25%) quimioembolización transarterial (TACE) y 16 (50%) cuidado paliativo. Veintinueve (83%) pacientes fallecieron. Conclusiones. La mayoría de los pacientes solo recibieron terapia debido al diagnóstico tardío lo cual se relaciona con una supervivencia pobre en esta serie, de ahí que sea pertinente buscar políticas de atención en salud que permitan una vigilancia estrecha y tamización adecuada para CHC en los pacientes con hepatopatía crónica. Como se ha descrito por otros autores, los niveles de AFP se relacionan con la supervivencia de los pacientes, independiente del tratamiento recibido.

Introduction. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) shortens survival significantly due to its usual late diagnosis.Objectives. Describe retrospectively the survival, clinical and biochemical characteristics in patients with a diagnosis of HCC.Patients and Methods. A retrospective study which included patients diagnosed with HCC was performed. The variables of interest were taken and the outcome was analyzed with a follow up of 6 month. The diagnosis of HCC was made in agreement with the criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and histologic criteria in the cases were biopsies were available. Results. 35 patients were included. Twelve (34%) had HCC and 23 (66%) cirrhosis with HCC. The etiologies of the cirrhosis and HCC cases were alcohol (12, 52%), HBV (3, 13%), HCV (1, 4.3%), cryptogenic (5, 21.7%), NASH (1, 4.3%), and coexistence of HBV and alcohol (1, 4.3%). In agreement with the Barcelona Clinic for Liver Cancer criteria 5 patients received liver transplantation (14.3%), 3 (8.6%) surgical resection, 8 (22.9%) TACE and 19 (54.2%) palliative care. Twenty nine (83%) of the patients died. Conclusions. The majority of patients only received palliative therapy due to the late diagnosis which is related with a poor survival in this series, that’s why is important to search for health policies that permit a close follow up and screening for HCC in patients with chronic liver disease. AFP levels are related with the survival of the patients independent of the treatment received.